学历教育 - 外语类

本题答案：

正确答案：A

本题答案：

正确答案：

Crimescanbedetestable,whileminoroffendersandtheircrimesarefromtimetotimetreatedwithleniency.Thus,somearguethatlawsshouldnotdiscriminate,andequallypunishminorcriminals—anopinionthatthisessayisagainst.

Tobeginwith,minorsareyettoapproachtheirmaturity,andtheircrimes,albeitserious,shouldbepunishedwiththeconsiderationoftheiryoungage.Internationallyspeaking,countriesmightdefinethestartofadulthooddifferently—18beingthemostcommon—buttheycommonlybelievethatthereisadistinctionbetweenminorcrimesandadultcrimes.Minorsarelikelytobegivenabetterchanceforrehabilitationwhentheycommitcrimesbecauseoftheirinexperienceoflifeandpossiblybetterlifeprospects.Inthatcase,milderpunishmentsareinflictedonjuveniledelinquents:lessersentencingandrelativelylessharshcorrectionfacilitiesareintroducedintheircases.

Moreover,consideringthecorrectionprocess,minoroffendersshouldnotbepunishedequallyasadultcriminals.Despitetheabove-mentionedargumentsthatareinyoungoffenders’defense,crimes,especiallyfeloniesbyminors,deserveheavypunishmenttodetercrimesandreducetheharmofthosecrimestothesociety.However,sendingminorstoadultprisonmightentailunexpectedlynegativeresults.First,minorsarenaturallyclosertomoresophisticatedcriminalsandcrimes,whichaggravatejuveniledelinquency.Second,wheninadultcorrectionalfacilities,youngcriminalsmightbethreatenedbyassaultsbyadultprisoners,mostlysexually,whichisnowhereclosertothepurposeofrehabilitation.

Insum,lawbreakers,betheyminorsornot,shouldbepunishedfortheirwrongdoings,butlessersentencesandspecialcorrectionalfacilitiesmightbemorereasonableandhelpful.

本题答案：

正确答案：

Today,manycommercialadvertisementscanbeseeneverywhere,sellingdifferentkindsofproductssuchascosmetics,toysandclothes.Somepeopleconcernthatthewidespreadofadvertisementsmayresultinthelossofindividualityamongpeople,astheytendtowearthesameclothesandusethesamemakeup.Frommyperspective,Icompletelydisagreewiththisviewpoint.

Admittedly,peoplefromdifferentwalksoflifehavevariousconsumptionviews.However,mostpeoplewouldbudgettheirdisposableincomewiselyinsteadofwastingallinasetofclotheswithoutseriousconsideration.Therefore,despitetheproliferationofthecommercialadvertisementsforthesameluxuryproduct,peoplewouldstillmakedecisionsofbuyingornotaccordingtotheirlimitedincome.

Also,peoplearecapableofdistinguishingwhethertheclothesintheadvertisementsuitthemselvesornot.Beingexposedinaseaofadvertisementsforlong,people'simmunesystemstowardsadvertisementshavestrengthened.Consequently,fewerpeoplewouldbeswayedbythegorgeousclothesintheadvisementsastheyrealizethatmostclothesonadvertisementsonlysuitformodelsbutnotfortheaverage.

Furthermore,somanydifferentadvertisementsareprovidedforpeople'soptionthatitisfairlydifficulttobethesamewithothers.Takeclothesforexample.Therearevariousstyles,rangingfromclassicaltomodern,childishtomature,conservativetosexy.Therefore,peoplestillcouldchoosetheirfavoritestyletomeettheirdemand.

Toconclude,duetothemulti-choiceofadvertisementandpeople'swisebudget,peoplewouldnotlosttheirindividualitiesunderthestrongpromotionofthesameproductintheadvertisement.

本题答案：
The backbreaking labor of the working poor. /The bowed backs of the working poor.
The backbreaking labor of the working poor. /The bowed backs of the working poor. 解析第一段最后一句“The American Dream for the well-to-do grows from the bowed backs of the working poor，who too often have to choose between groceries and rent．”中的grows from和问题中的is built upon是一个意思。因此，本题可以用“The bowed backs of the working poor，”来回答，也可以基于理解，回答成“The backbreaking labor of the working labor”。

本题答案：
G
G 解析说者在向人介绍工作，这种工作是推售打印机。

本题答案：

正确答案：C

本题答案：
solar array
solar array 解析此处需要填入名词性成分作from的宾语。本题考查Lewis Center中所使用的能量的来源，通过原文可知，其主要是通过太阳光线来提供能量，题干中energy source和原文powered entirely by相对应，故此处答案为 solar array。

本题答案：

正确答案：

我们发现贵司产品在价格和质量上能使我们的客户满意，我们给你下该表格中此类别的订单

本题答案：
We often talk about the success of a country but when we stop to think about the measure of it we may find it difficult to define a clear criterion. It has long been a firm belief of some people that the criterion lies in the quality of life enjoyed by the people of a country regardless of whether it is rich or not in economic terms. According to them a country can never be called a successful one if its people have a lot to complain about the life they are living even though they have a sufficient amount of money to spend. Thus to follow their line of argumentation the government of a country should try their utmost to satisfy every need of its citizens and make them happy instead of devoting all its efforts to the economic development. However like many others who find it hard to agree fully with this opinion I tend to take the general economic strength of a country as the basis for measurement. In the first place the rich economy of a country is as far as I see it a prerequisite for the high quality life of its people. Only when a nation big or small focuses on its economic development can it provide enough jobs for its citizens who in turn can earn sufficient income to pay for their life necessities such as housing clothing food and education which are all the key parameters of a happiness formula. Secondly when it is rich a country can channel more money into the development of public facilities and amenities which obviously contribute a great deal to the life improvement of its people. In addition the wealth of a country ensures its important status in the international community. Needless to say with a strong economy a nation will have a major role to play in world affairs. For instance the United States and some other Western countries have a greater influence on the world than most of the others both politically and diplomatically simply because they have more economic edges among other things. In conclusion only when the economy of a country is developed and its people are content with their life can this country be regarded as a successful country. A happy life in a poor country is simply impossible and even unimaginable in the world today.
We often talk about the success of a country, but when we stop to think about the measure of it we may find it difficult to define a clear criterion. It has long been a firm belief of some people that the criterion lies in the quality of life enjoyed by the people of a country regardless of whether it is rich or not in economic terms. According to them, a country can never be called a successful one if its people have a lot to complain about the life they are living even though they have a sufficient amount of money to spend. Thus, to follow their line of argumentation, the government of a country should try their utmost to satisfy every need of its citizens and make them happy instead of devoting all its efforts to the economic development. However, like many others who find it hard to agree fully with this opinion, I tend to take the general economic strength of a country as the basis for measurement. In the first place, the rich economy of a country is, as far as I see it, a prerequisite for the high quality life of its people. Only when a nation, big or small, focuses on its economic development can it provide enough jobs for its citizens, who in turn can earn sufficient income to pay for their life necessities, such as housing, clothing, food and education, which are all the key parameters of a happiness formula. Secondly, when it is rich, a country can channel more money into the development of public facilities and amenities, which obviously contribute a great deal to the life improvement of its people. In addition, the wealth of a country ensures its important status in the international community. Needless to say, with a strong economy, a nation will have a major role to play in world affairs. For instance, the United States and some other Western countries have a greater influence on the world than most of the others both politically and diplomatically simply because they have more economic edges among other things. In conclusion, only when the economy of a country is developed and its people are content with their life can this country be regarded as a successful country. A happy life in a poor country is simply impossible and even unimaginable in the world today. 解析第一部分为文章的第一、二段。第一段引出话题，第二段对题目中给出的两种观点中的一种进行简单讨论后表明作者支持另外一种观点，(However，like many others who find it hard to agree fully with this opinion，I tend to take the general economic strength of a country as the basis for measurement．)这一观点构成了文章的主题思想。
第二部分为文章的第三段，这一部分从三个方面论述了为什么说一个国家的经济实力是衡量一个国家成功与否的标准。值得注意的是，作者在论述自己观点的同时批判了国家是否成功与金钱多少无关的看法。
第三部分为文章的第四段，作者对全文作出总结，这一部分与第二段最后的thesis statement在内容上是一致的，但从语言表达上作者最大限度地避免了重复，这就有效地增加了词汇的范围以及句子结构的多样性。

本题答案：

正确答案：

我们给你报了个好价格，我们不想再做任何让步，接受与否，你看着办吧。